Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimiGa22HJFCj8_aZcsZfPfAgmE9yxn4VfOTj3sx@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 11/22/2010 06:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Maybe instead of "textual label", we should say "name"? But that >>> doesn't seem like quite le mot juste either. "label" is actually a >>> pretty good word for the text representation of an enum value. > >> Oh my boots and buttons. I think we're splitting some very fine hairs >> here. A few weeks back you were telling us that label wasn't a very good >> word and shouldn't be sanctified in the SQL. > > It isn't a very good word for the abstract value, IMO, but the text > representation is a different concept. +1 for what Andrew said. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: