Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21845.1290473194@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 11/22/2010 06:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Maybe instead of "textual label", we should say "name"? But that >> doesn't seem like quite le mot juste either. "label" is actually a >> pretty good word for the text representation of an enum value. > Oh my boots and buttons. I think we're splitting some very fine hairs > here. A few weeks back you were telling us that label wasn't a very good > word and shouldn't be sanctified in the SQL. It isn't a very good word for the abstract value, IMO, but the text representation is a different concept. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: