Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTimcWwPm7J9WGp1H_KcUlC3TZQhndBirFprjxiLb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> My preference would be to stick to a style where we identify the >> committer using the author tag and note the patch author, reviewers, >> whether the committer made changes, etc. in the commit message. A >> single author field doesn't feel like enough for our workflow, and >> having a mix of authors and committers in the author field seems like >> a mess. > > Well, I had looked forward to actually putting the real author into the > author field. I hadn't realised that was possible until Guillaume did so on his first commit to the new pgAdmin GIT repo. It seems to work nicely: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=08e2826d90129bd4e4b3b7462bab682dd6a703e4 -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: