Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C4ABEA3.4030508@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS) (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le 21/07/2010 09:53, Dave Page a écrit : > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >>> My preference would be to stick to a style where we identify the >>> committer using the author tag and note the patch author, reviewers, >>> whether the committer made changes, etc. in the commit message. A >>> single author field doesn't feel like enough for our workflow, and >>> having a mix of authors and committers in the author field seems like >>> a mess. >> >> Well, I had looked forward to actually putting the real author into the >> author field. > > I hadn't realised that was possible until Guillaume did so on his > first commit to the new pgAdmin GIT repo. It seems to work nicely: > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=08e2826d90129bd4e4b3b7462bab682dd6a703e4 > It's one of the nice things with git. So, I'm eager to use it with the pgAdmin repo. -- Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: