Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTim4yUSJEiC2QoO38GM7gTXjR-v5qPe+umhs2XLb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed! (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!
|
| Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote: > I reviewed a couple patched, and I added my review to the commitfest page. > > If I find a problem, its obvious I should mark the patch as "returned with > feedback". Only if it's got sufficiently serious flaws that getting it committed during this CommitFest is not practical. If it just needs some revision, "Waiting on Author" is the right place. > But what if I'm happy with it? I'm not a hacker so cannot do C code review, > should I leave it alone? Mark it as "ready for committer"? Yep, that's fine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: