Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikxsR5ugwxsj4yFMYrn0wOArWmKkJZShvAYvcxP@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 20:38, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > Yes, of course, int8 functions are separate. I attach an updated > patch, although I still think there's a better way of doing this. Thanks. Please add the patch to the *current* commitfest because it's a bugfix. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=9 I've not tested the patch yet, but if we could drop the following line in the patch, the code could be much cleaner. /* ensure first value in series should exist */ > I'm not sure how this should be handled. Should there just be a check > for either kind of infinity and return an error if that's the case? I Maybe so. It also works if we had infinity on timestamp overflow, but I've not tested yet. Anyway, we need similar fix for timestamp versions. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: