Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikSRudj6B6yeJ0L+ft+mVGbomkbR-rVzf0RNaVX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8 February 2011 09:22, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 20:38, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >> Yes, of course, int8 functions are separate. I attach an updated >> patch, although I still think there's a better way of doing this. > > Thanks. Please add the patch to the *current* commitfest > because it's a bugfix. > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=9 > > I've not tested the patch yet, but if we could drop the following > line in the patch, the code could be much cleaner. > /* ensure first value in series should exist */ > >> I'm not sure how this should be handled. Should there just be a check >> for either kind of infinity and return an error if that's the case? I > > Maybe so. It also works if we had infinity on timestamp overflow, but > I've not tested yet. Anyway, we need similar fix for timestamp versions. Well, in its current state, I expect it to get rejected, but I guess at least it gets a better chance of being looked at. I've added it to the commitfest now. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: