Re: Beta 2 build issue

On 10 June 2010 17:48, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue jun 10 12:20:57 -0400 2010:
>> On 10 June 2010 16:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> On 10 June 2010 15:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> >>> You need to look into why configure failed to detect that your platf=
orm
>> >>> has unsetenv.
>> >
>> >> Is that heimdal_strlcpy patch normal too?
>> >
>> > Sorry, no idea what you're talking about. =A0(I don't do Gentoo.)
>> >
>>
>> It's a patch applied during the ebuild process. =A0I'm not sure what its
>> role is.
>
> I looked at it and I think it's probably harmless and not related to the
> unsetenv issue. =A0The interesting lines are:
>
> 28 =A0 =A0 =A0-LIBS=3D`echo "$LIBS" | sed -e 's/-ledit//g' -e 's/-lreadli=
ne//g'`
> 29 =A0 =A0 =A0+LIBS=3D`echo "$LIBS" | sed -e 's/-ledit//g' -e 's/-lreadli=
ne//g' -e 's/-lgssapi//g' -e 's/-lkrb5//g'`
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/postgresql=
-base/files/postgresql-base-8.4-9.0-heimdal_strlcpy.patch?view=3Dmarkup
>

Here's a mindless stab at a solution... should I disable kerberos in the bu=
ild?

Thom