Re: git: uh-oh

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> writes:
>> On 20/08/10 21:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm still confused as to why this results in such massive weirdness in
>>> the generated git history, though.  If it simply caused an extra commit
>>> that adds the new file slightly earlier than the commit we think of as
>>> adding the file, I wouldn't be complaining.
>
>> Isn't this what's happening?
>
> Uh, no, the excitement is about this:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/REL8_3_10
>
> There are a whole lot of commits listed there that have nothing to do
> with anything that ever happened on the 8.3 branch.

Tom,

The problem you are looking at here has been fixed.  We are looking at
a different problem now.  See:

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=git-migration-test.git;a=summary

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company