Re: git: uh-oh

Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> writes:
> On 20/08/10 21:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm still confused as to why this results in such massive weirdness in
>> the generated git history, though.  If it simply caused an extra commit
>> that adds the new file slightly earlier than the commit we think of as
>> adding the file, I wouldn't be complaining.

> Isn't this what's happening?

Uh, no, the excitement is about this:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/REL8_3_10

There are a whole lot of commits listed there that have nothing to do
with anything that ever happened on the 8.3 branch.
        regards, tom lane