Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikTFG8-4sfJsQ16Fdu1TzZOh_zUtb-QuBPuo9jF@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: >> > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> >> a) Eliminate WAL logging entirely > > If we elimiate WAL logging, that means a reinstall is required for even > a postmaster crash, which is a new non-durable behavior. > > Also, we just added wal_level = minimal, which might end up being a poor > name choice of we want wal_level = off in PG 9.1. Perhaps we should > have used wal_level = crash_safe in 9.0. > > I have added the following TODO: > > Consider a non-crash-safe wal_level that eliminates WAL activity > > * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00300.php I don't think we need a system-wide setting for that. I believe that the unlogged tables I'm working on will handle that case. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: