Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201006231937.o5NJbKp05127@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: > > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> a) Eliminate WAL logging entirely If we elimiate WAL logging, that means a reinstall is required for even a postmaster crash, which is a new non-durable behavior. Also, we just added wal_level = minimal, which might end up being a poor name choice of we want wal_level = off in PG 9.1. Perhaps we should have used wal_level = crash_safe in 9.0. I have added the following TODO: Consider a non-crash-safe wal_level that eliminates WAL activity * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00300.php -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: