Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
| От | Aidan Van Dyk |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTik+gdwG=TxknrYCg2fgwB5b-XdM-X-jNFgt8Dw+@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad > enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say, > search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community. Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"... And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less* ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to keep going back to gmane's search) a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: