Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D152EB6.6000407@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/24/2010 06:26 PM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >> I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad >> enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say, >> search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community. > Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"... > > And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less* > ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to > keep going back to gmane's search) > > It's deja vu all over again. See mailing list archives for details. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: