Re: postgres performance tunning
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres performance tunning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=ownApbNimEq4bb0YO5vxE9E=sHkxnY-i0RMQS@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres performance tunning (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Scott Marlowe wrote: >>>> I can sustain about 5,000 transactions per second on a machine with 8 >>>> cores (2 years old) and 14 15k seagate hard drives. >>> >>> Right. You can hit 2 to 3000/second with a relatively inexpensive system, >>> so long as you have a battery-backed RAID controller and a few hard drives. >>> Doing 5K writes/second is going to take a giant pile of hard drive or SSDs >>> to pull off. There is no possible way to meet the performance objectives >>> here without a lot more cores in the server and some pretty beefy storage >>> too. >> >> Is this with synchronous_commit on, or off? > > Off. It doesn't seem to make a lot of difference one you're running > on a good battery backed caching RAID controller. Sorry, that's ON not OFF. Turning it off doesn't seem to ...
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: