Re: postgres performance tunning
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres performance tunning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=ZAyRYfjUofYXpLdR5Aq+xX3Q38ALgjhrvdr7f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres performance tunning (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres performance tunning
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Scott Marlowe wrote: >>> I can sustain about 5,000 transactions per second on a machine with 8 >>> cores (2 years old) and 14 15k seagate hard drives. >> >> Right. You can hit 2 to 3000/second with a relatively inexpensive system, >> so long as you have a battery-backed RAID controller and a few hard drives. >> Doing 5K writes/second is going to take a giant pile of hard drive or SSDs >> to pull off. There is no possible way to meet the performance objectives >> here without a lot more cores in the server and some pretty beefy storage >> too. > > Is this with synchronous_commit on, or off? Off. It doesn't seem to make a lot of difference one you're running on a good battery backed caching RAID controller.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: