Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=eGz_jT92nqGVB9_jvFZ-bS-K3zW0qomsSbAPR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public
requires annoying double click
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 22:44, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 23/09/2010 22:37, Thom Brown a écrit : >> On 23 September 2010 21:31, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Peter Dietz <pdietz84@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> I have a minor grievance with pgAdmin3's Graphical Query Builder. >>>> I click plus on Schemas, then public has no plus, so I must double click >>>> public, then the plus button appears, which I can then click to expand the >>>> list to see whats in my database. >>>> [-] my-database-name >>>> [+] Catalogs >>>> [-] Schemas >>>> public >>>> I would like that public would already have the expand symbol present by >>>> default. >>>> This is only a minor inconvenience, but it will hopefully save me, and every >>>> other user a little bit of time. >>> >>> It probably wouldn't, because it would require pre-populating the >>> node. If you have multiple schemas, that means scanning all of them >>> for objects in advance of when you actually want them. >> >> It is a bit unintuitive to present the user with a tree which suddenly >> stops, but expect them to know to double click on it to go further. >> Couldn't this have a [+] anyway, which would disappear if there was >> nothing inside? And is there that much of a cost of doing the scan >> anyway? The user will nearly always need to open the schema node >> anyway. >> > > I'm not sure we can do this. The "+" sign appears when the node has > children. And before one double clicks on the node, there are no > children to this node. > > I don't say this is impossible. Just that I don't see an easy way to > code what you want. Could we just create a fake empty item under it that says "loading..." or something like that? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: