Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C9BBC24.7000500@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public
requires annoying double click
Re: Graphical Query Builder -- expanding public requires annoying double click |
Список | pgadmin-support |
Le 23/09/2010 22:37, Thom Brown a écrit : > On 23 September 2010 21:31, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Peter Dietz <pdietz84@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> I have a minor grievance with pgAdmin3's Graphical Query Builder. >>> I click plus on Schemas, then public has no plus, so I must double click >>> public, then the plus button appears, which I can then click to expand the >>> list to see whats in my database. >>> [-] my-database-name >>> [+] Catalogs >>> [-] Schemas >>> public >>> I would like that public would already have the expand symbol present by >>> default. >>> This is only a minor inconvenience, but it will hopefully save me, and every >>> other user a little bit of time. >> >> It probably wouldn't, because it would require pre-populating the >> node. If you have multiple schemas, that means scanning all of them >> for objects in advance of when you actually want them. > > It is a bit unintuitive to present the user with a tree which suddenly > stops, but expect them to know to double click on it to go further. > Couldn't this have a [+] anyway, which would disappear if there was > nothing inside? And is there that much of a cost of doing the scan > anyway? The user will nearly always need to open the schema node > anyway. > I'm not sure we can do this. The "+" sign appears when the node has children. And before one double clicks on the node, there are no children to this node. I don't say this is impossible. Just that I don't see an easy way to code what you want. -- Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: