Re: What happened to the is_ family of functions proposal?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What happened to the is_ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=QPvSTT75UcEi7R7U=0mUbOfMSo_aV7fGWD_os@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: What happened to the is_ |
Ответы |
Re: What happened to the is_ |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I think it would be useful to have a way of testing whether a cast to >> a given type will succeed. The biggest problem with the >> exception-catching method is not that it requires writing a function >> (which, IMHO, is no big deal) but that exception handling is pretty >> slow and inefficient. You end up doing things like... write a regexp >> to see whether the data is in approximately the right format and then >> if it is try the cast inside an exception block. Yuck. > > The problem here is that putting the exception handling in C doesn't > make things any better: it's still slow and inefficient. And in the > general case the only way to be sure that a string will be accepted by > the input function is to try it. Given the current API, that is true. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: