Re: What happened to the is_ family of functions proposal?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What happened to the is_ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3790.1285084196@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: What happened to the is_ |
Ответы |
Re: What happened to the is_ |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I think it would be useful to have a way of testing whether a cast to > a given type will succeed. The biggest problem with the > exception-catching method is not that it requires writing a function > (which, IMHO, is no big deal) but that exception handling is pretty > slow and inefficient. You end up doing things like... write a regexp > to see whether the data is in approximately the right format and then > if it is try the cast inside an exception block. Yuck. The problem here is that putting the exception handling in C doesn't make things any better: it's still slow and inefficient. And in the general case the only way to be sure that a string will be accepted by the input function is to try it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: