Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=B6_c6ySqzc-+s_CWBOkXrfo--QsWOJvKfTG8E@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/7/31 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> On fre, 2010-07-30 at 12:50 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote: >>> > * xml_is_well_formed returns true for simple text >>> > >>> > postgres=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('ssss'); >>> > xml_is_well_formed >>> > -------------------- >>> > t >>> > (1 row) >>> > >>> > it is probably wrong result - is it ok?? >>> > >>> >>> Yes this is OK, pure text is valid XML content. >> >> Are you speaking of XML content fragments that SQL/XML defines? >> >> Well-formedness should probably only allow XML documents. > > I think the point of this function is to determine whether a cast to > xml will throw an error. The behavior should probably match exactly > whatever test would be applied there. I agree with this idea - so I am able to do: postgres=# select 'xxx'::xml;xml -----xxx (1 row) I have not any suggestions now - so I'll change flag to "ready to commit" Regards Pavel Stehule > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise Postgres Company >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: