Re: refactoring comment.c
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=8+x0+9xfMV6aM3_uTQn_zWaVtBxLEE7hm3euS@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: refactoring comment.c (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> What's a bit odd about this is that I do get warnings for this kind of >> thing in general, which get turned into errors since I compile with >> -Werror; and in fact the version of the patch that I committed has no >> fewer than four places where there is a comment that says "placate >> compiler". But for some reason the compiler I used to develop this >> patch (gcc-4.2.1 i686-apple-darwin10) did not complain about this >> case, for reasons that are not quite clear to me. > > gcc has been able to detect possibly-uninitialized scalar variables > for many years, but only fairly-recent versions seem to apply the > same type of logic to fields of local structs. I thought it might be something like that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: