Re: refactoring comment.c
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9555.1282960168@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: refactoring comment.c (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: refactoring comment.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > What's a bit odd about this is that I do get warnings for this kind of > thing in general, which get turned into errors since I compile with > -Werror; and in fact the version of the patch that I committed has no > fewer than four places where there is a comment that says "placate > compiler". But for some reason the compiler I used to develop this > patch (gcc-4.2.1 i686-apple-darwin10) did not complain about this > case, for reasons that are not quite clear to me. gcc has been able to detect possibly-uninitialized scalar variables for many years, but only fairly-recent versions seem to apply the same type of logic to fields of local structs. I've also noticed that sometimes it can only spot the potential problem after inlining a function that sets the local variable, and so a more recent version and/or a more aggressive -O setting can also affect whether you get a warning. In short: this warning is a lot more context sensitive than you might guess. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: