Re: win32 service code
От | Claudio Natoli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: win32 service code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F485@harris.memetrics.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | win32 service code ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: win32 service code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
My 2c, > 1) Separate binary "pgservice.exe" that will CreateProcess() the > postmaster.exe. > Advantages: Zero impact on postmaster code. Simple to do. > Disadvantages: Adds a platform-specific binary. My preference. Personally, I think we should make this pg_ctl. > 2) Include in postmaster doing an extra CreateProcess(). > Advantages: No extra binary. Low impact on postmaster code. > Disadvantages: Two postmaster.exe:s. running (confusing? overhead?) This is what I've currently got. I pretty much hate seeing two postmaster.exe/s running. > 3) Include in postmaster but running on a separate thread (not process as (2)) > Advantages: No extra binary. No extra process. Most integration. > Disadvantages: Probably larger impact on postmaster code. IMHO, the worst of all options. I'm itching to throw this code somewhere :-) Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see <a href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html</a>
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: