win32 service code
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | win32 service code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE1716A6@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: win32 service code
Re: win32 service code |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Hi! Last I spoke with Claudio, he was still waiting for some reactions from others than me on how we want the service code. So I figured I'd post a recap of the options we have. I've added some advantages/disadvantages, but those are my thoughts only. There are sure to be others. 1) Separate binary "pgservice.exe" that will CreateProcess() the postmaster.exe. Advantages: Zero impact on postmaster code. Simple to do. Disadvantages: Adds a platform-specific binary. 2) Include in postmaster doing an extra CreateProcess(). Advantages: No extra binary. Low impact on postmaster code. Disadvantages: Two postmaster.exe:s. running (confusing? overhead?) 3) Include in postmaster but running on a separate thread (not process as (2)) Advantages: No extra binary. No extra process. Most integration. Disadvantages: Probably larger impact on postmaster code. As said, I've probably missed some in adv/disadv, but I think I got all our options. Thoughts? //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: