Re: procpid?
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9c61a43ed89612a7921ebf5d50ea28ef@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: procpid?
Re: procpid? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 >> Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards >> compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better >> designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever). > I thought about that too when reading the thread the first time, but > "pg_stat_sessions" sounds better. Our documentation also primarily refers to a > database connection as a "session", i think. No, this is clearly connections, not sessions. At least based on the items in the postgresql.conf file, especially max_connections (probably one of the items most closely associated with pg_stat_activity) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201106161132 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk36IjYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg8MgCgkMNw1o37cgmtJdYBAsGl7kz6 Q8sAoISFra0LyQjyKw3zcapWBdCLh2RV =EYAc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: