Re: procpid?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1308252949-sup-4754@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Greg Sabino Mullane's message of jue jun 16 15:33:35 UTC 2011: > > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > >> Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards > >> compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better > >> designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever). > > > I thought about that too when reading the thread the first time, but > > "pg_stat_sessions" sounds better. Our documentation also primarily refers to a > > database connection as a "session", i think. > > No, this is clearly connections, not sessions. At least based on the items > in the postgresql.conf file, especially max_connections (probably one of the > items most closely associated with pg_stat_activity) That doesn't include autovacuum, though, whereas the new view would. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: