Re: postgre vs MySQL
От | jose javier parra sanchez |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgre vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 99f1636c0803120947w520e95f2j448cab19b403f260@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgre vs MySQL (Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgre vs MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Take a look at pgpool . http://pgpool.projects.postgresql.org/ 2008/3/12, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:13:14 -0700 > paul rivers <rivers.paul@gmail.com> wrote: > > > For a database of InnoDB tables, people tend to replicate the > > database, and then backup the slave (unless the db is trivially > > > That recalled me the *unsupported* feeling I have that it is easier > to setup a HA replication solution on MySQL. > > Pardon my ignorance of serious DBA jargon... > > I'm thinking to something suited for load balancing the read as > highest priority in terms of performance *and* duplicate the write > across different boxes without the application layer has to know > about it as second priority in terms of performance... > > I just would like to be contradicted and pointed to some viable > (easy?) setup for pgsql, so that I and other people will get rid of > this preconception if any. > > > -- > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo > http://www.webthatworks.it > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: