Re: postgre vs MySQL
От | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgre vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080312173907.2d1c6a0f@webthatworks.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgre vs MySQL (paul rivers <rivers.paul@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgre vs MySQL
Re: postgre vs MySQL |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:13:14 -0700 paul rivers <rivers.paul@gmail.com> wrote: > For a database of InnoDB tables, people tend to replicate the > database, and then backup the slave (unless the db is trivially That recalled me the *unsupported* feeling I have that it is easier to setup a HA replication solution on MySQL. Pardon my ignorance of serious DBA jargon... I'm thinking to something suited for load balancing the read as highest priority in terms of performance *and* duplicate the write across different boxes without the application layer has to know about it as second priority in terms of performance... I just would like to be contradicted and pointed to some viable (easy?) setup for pgsql, so that I and other people will get rid of this preconception if any. -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: