Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9980.1134852474@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
Список | pgsql-general |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > I'm happy to lump all the docs back into the README if that's what you > want, but I split it up in the first place because it was getting very long. No, I'm not really proposing that we force all contrib modules to have only a README. I'm just annoyed by the lack of consistency (dblink/doc versus tsearch2/docs, and some of the other modules seem to have some doc files just loose in their top directory). It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the Makefiles don't install them either. It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to forestall name conflicts? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: