Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>
>>I'm happy to lump all the docs back into the README if that's what you
>>want, but I split it up in the first place because it was getting very long.
>
> No, I'm not really proposing that we force all contrib modules to have
> only a README.  I'm just annoyed by the lack of consistency (dblink/doc
> versus tsearch2/docs, and some of the other modules seem to have some
> doc files just loose in their top directory).
>
> It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
> Makefiles don't install them either.
>
> It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
> to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to
> forestall name conflicts?
>

While I'm messing with dblink, did you want me to do anything WRT this?

Thanks,

Joe