Re: buildfarm breakage
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: buildfarm breakage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1002090814g12ba7f15h710236d994399692@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: buildfarm breakage (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: buildfarm breakage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> Here's a patch that "fixes" this. I put it locally for the radius >> authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should >> we put this in /port/ somewhere, or is this good for now? > > How about dropping it in src/backend/port/win32/mingwcompat.c ? Oh, meh. I had forgotten we had that file :-) Thanks for the reminder, will verify tonight that it still works after I do that. > The advantage of putting it in src/port/ is that it would possibly > help client-side code sometime in future. But what seems more likely > to happen is that the mingw people will fix their oversight, and > then we'd be risking link conflicts, which will be harder to fix on > the client side. So I'm inclined to not go there as long as we > don't actually need it on client side. But putting mingw hacks > in a mingw-specific place seems a good idea. yeah, agreed. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: