Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1001120653w61c1fa96hd3a5040e719c36a6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> On mån, 2010-01-11 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> -- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres > >> Um, that tag is the "name", and if you change that, the name in CREATE >> FUNCTION also changes. > > So? Sorry if this is talking about something completely different, haven't followed the thread closely, but: will this change the output of pg_restore -l? If so, changing the tag is likely to break scripts, and IMHO should be avoided if possible. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: