Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3503.1263307495@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On mån, 2010-01-11 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> -- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres > Um, that tag is the "name", and if you change that, the name in CREATE > FUNCTION also changes. So? > In the mean time, hacking it into the sort function itself as a special > case works out fine, per attached patch. One might frown upon such an > exception, but then again, function overloading is an exception to the > one-name-per-object rule all over the place anyway. ;-) No, that's a completely bogus solution, because it depends on type OIDs. It won't be stable across dump/reload, which defeats the purpose AFAICS. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: