Re: cvs chapters in our docs

2009/12/7 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
>> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
>> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
>> backpatch things like this though, so comments on that?
>
> The sort of people who would actually have a use for the information
> are unlikely to be looking at back branches, so I don't particularly
> see the point.  But if you wanna do the work ...

I'd do 8.4, becuase that's what shows up under /current/ on the website.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/