Re: cvs chapters in our docs

Magnus Hagander escribió:
> 2009/12/7 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> >> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
> >> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
> >> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
> >> backpatch things like this though, so comments on that?
> >
> > The sort of people who would actually have a use for the information
> > are unlikely to be looking at back branches, so I don't particularly
> > see the point.  But if you wanna do the work ...
> 
> I'd do 8.4, becuase that's what shows up under /current/ on the website.

8.4 makes sense to me.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support