Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c0908110730wffea694wbe4567190483e12a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on
Windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 19:33, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:58, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> 8.2 as well, no? >> >>> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv >>> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I >>> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a >>> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first. >> >> If it's at all hard to do, I could see deprecating 8.2 for Windows >> instead. > > I haven't looked at how much work it would be at all yet. So let's do > that before we decide to deprecate anything. As mentioned downthread, > 8.2 is a very widespread release, and we really want to avoid > deprecating it. Here's an attempt at a backport to 8.2. I haven't examined it in detail, but it passes "make check" on mingw. Comments? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: