Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c0908101033y1a1d3b30ka14e41395fd84fd8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on
Windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:58, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> 8.2 as well, no? > >> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv >> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I >> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a >> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first. > > If it's at all hard to do, I could see deprecating 8.2 for Windows > instead. I haven't looked at how much work it would be at all yet. So let's do that before we decide to deprecate anything. As mentioned downthread, 8.2 is a very widespread release, and we really want to avoid deprecating it. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: