Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837.990079595@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp() (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> I certainly will not be applying any jdbc stuff to 7.1.X. I was told >> not to apply stuff during beta. I am sure not going to apply anything >> to a minor release. > OK, but if someone takes responsibility for the accuracy and > effectiveness of a patch, then it should be considered for application. > We had trouble during beta applying larger patches or patches which were > not correct; some of which could be vetted by simple inspection. Bruce got pounded (quite properly I thought) for applying patches during late beta that he had not verified and indeed was not in a position to verify. The rules need to be at least as stringent for patches that go into a stable-release branch, since we don't normally do much beta testing for dot-releases. But as long as someone has adequately checked the patch, I don't think there should be a rule against putting bug fixes into 7.1.* ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: