Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105171142.f4HBgsY07852@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce got pounded (quite properly I thought) for applying patches > during late beta that he had not verified and indeed was not in a > position to verify. The rules need to be at least as stringent for > patches that go into a stable-release branch, since we don't normally > do much beta testing for dot-releases. But as long as someone has > adequately checked the patch, I don't think there should be a rule > against putting bug fixes into 7.1.* ... Toward the end, I actually got approval from other JDBC developers before applying patches and people were still not happy. Also, this was during feature freeze in February, not even in beta yet. I know it was February because I just applied all my outstanding JDBC patches since February 1, and many of those should probably have been in 7.1.X too. So, I am not going to apply it. If someone else wants to, go ahead. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: