Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9703.1102105248@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6 ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > 1. Buildfarm doesn't yet have that many platforms on it. It's not as bad as all that. Our current list of supported platforms (ie, things that got tested last time) is AIXFree/Open/NetBSD covered by buildfarmHPUX used daily by moiIRIXLinux covered by buildfarmOS X tested pretty often by moiSolaris covered by buildfarmTru64UnixWareWindows/Cygwin covered bybuildfarm With respect to hardware it's x86 covered by buildfarmia64x86_64 covered by buildfarmARMAlphaMIPS covered by buildfarmm68kPA-RISC used daily by moiPPC tested pretty often by moiRS6000 isn't this sameas PPC?S/390Sparc covered by buildfarm Considering that we have both 32- and 64-bit, little- and big-endian hardware in there, most of the basic hardware gotchas are covered; the only thing I think is at much risk is the spinlock assembler code, which we change seldom. Where the buildfarm falls down a bit is on the cross-product coverage. But I think you're not going to get the cross product without a call for port reports; there aren't that many people who are going to offer dedicated time on every random platform there is. It would be nice to get an Alpha into the buildfarm, and PPC too. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: