Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
От | Kenneth Marshall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041203203310.GG8029@it.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:20:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > 1. Buildfarm doesn't yet have that many platforms on it. > > It's not as bad as all that. Our current list of supported platforms > (ie, things that got tested last time) is > > AIX > Free/Open/NetBSD covered by buildfarm > HPUX used daily by moi > IRIX > Linux covered by buildfarm > OS X tested pretty often by moi > Solaris covered by buildfarm > Tru64 > UnixWare > Windows/Cygwin covered by buildfarm > > With respect to hardware it's > > x86 covered by buildfarm > ia64 > x86_64 covered by buildfarm > ARM > Alpha > MIPS covered by buildfarm > m68k > PA-RISC used daily by moi > PPC tested pretty often by moi > RS6000 isn't this same as PPC? This is the IBM Power4 and now Power5 architecture which is different from the PowerPC. Ken
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: