Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 95c0d90ca8a718c9e6737617ac06458b@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? (Jakub Ouhrabka <kuba@comgate.cz>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 >> The auto-reconnect behavior is long-established and desirable. What's >> not desirable is continuing with any statements remaining on the same >> line, I think. We need to flush the input buffer on reconnect. > So if I understand it correctly, if I need correct transaction behaviour > in psql even in case of disconnection the only safe way is to use one > statement per line. > > Is this correct? Yes, that is correct. Pretty big gotcha. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201005240925 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkv6fncACgkQvJuQZxSWSsipbQCg3Cn6Hh4Uk9i2TwaKNgzB1Xef apIAoLiNoJT4pjtA4xaZXL11XdgUYwph =MF9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: