Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+
От | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 94d07248-4b21-13ec-be1f-84696c602fa5@8kdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+ (rado@edno.moe) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 03/04/17 21:15, rado@edno.moe wrote: > Hi everyone. > On 2017-04-03 21:58, Stephen Frost wrote: >> Dave, >> >> * Dave Cramer (pg@fastcrypt.com) wrote: >>> On 3 April 2017 at 14:33, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@8kdata.com> >>> wrote: >>> Quick eyeball of the latest two versions shows significant download of >>> jre6, and a scary data of 1208 jre7. I wonder what project is using >>> that? >> >> Chef. >> >> All but ~4000 of those hits were by either "Chef Client" or "Chef >> Knife", most of which were, unsurprisingly, just 304's ("not modified"). > > From 100 000 downloads? > This link shows which other POMs are referring to 9.4.1208.jre7: > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/9.4.1208.jre7/usages > Keep in mind that I don't know how reliable is this data, but Clojure > and Spring Boot are quite popular projects. This doesn't seem to happen with current version 42: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/42.0.0.jre7/usages (not used so far) BTW, description of this version of the driver, according to http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/42.0.0.jre7 is: "Java JDBC 4.2 (JRE 8+) driver for PostgreSQL database" LOL! Álvaro -- Álvaro Hernández Tortosa ----------- <8K>data
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: