Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+
От | rado@edno.moe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0fccb64d158572ceefd8f8da0990947a@edno.moe обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+ (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi everyone. On 2017-04-03 21:58, Stephen Frost wrote: > Dave, > > * Dave Cramer (pg@fastcrypt.com) wrote: >> On 3 April 2017 at 14:33, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@8kdata.com> >> wrote: >> Quick eyeball of the latest two versions shows significant download of >> jre6, and a scary data of 1208 jre7. I wonder what project is using >> that? > > Chef. > > All but ~4000 of those hits were by either "Chef Client" or "Chef > Knife", most of which were, unsurprisingly, just 304's ("not > modified"). From 100 000 downloads? This link shows which other POMs are referring to 9.4.1208.jre7: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/9.4.1208.jre7/usages Keep in mind that I don't know how reliable is this data, but Clojure and Spring Boot are quite popular projects. > There were 241 actual downloads, all from Chef Client or Chef Knife > again and from just as recent as a few days ago. > > That was from 93 distinct IPs. > > Thanks! > > Stephen
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: