Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10911010424k6771590ey3e22c2acb9a47aa4@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le vendredi 30 octobre 2009 à 23:48:45, Tom Lane a écrit : >> Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes: >> > How is pgAdmin determining the serial type in this case? >> >> Most likely it's looking for the pg_depend entry that shows the sequence >> as being "owned by" the column. However, that's an oversimplification >> of reality. I would imagine that pgAdmin will lie to you in exactly >> the same cases that used to break pg_dump (notably, where someone has >> manually adjusted either the default expression or the sequence...) >> > > I've just read this. I wasn't aware of this. Should we suppress this behavior > of pgAdmin? Do you have a proposed fix? I suspect people won't want us to stop showing columns as 'SERIAL' when they actually were created that way. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: