Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200911120900.58400.guillaume@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le dimanche 1 novembre 2009 à 13:24:10, Dave Page a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > > Le vendredi 30 octobre 2009 à 23:48:45, Tom Lane a écrit : > >> Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes: > >> > How is pgAdmin determining the serial type in this case? > >> > >> Most likely it's looking for the pg_depend entry that shows the sequence > >> as being "owned by" the column. However, that's an oversimplification > >> of reality. I would imagine that pgAdmin will lie to you in exactly > >> the same cases that used to break pg_dump (notably, where someone has > >> manually adjusted either the default expression or the sequence...) > > > > I've just read this. I wasn't aware of this. Should we suppress this > > behavior of pgAdmin? > > Do you have a proposed fix? I suspect people won't want us to stop > showing columns as 'SERIAL' when they actually were created that way. > Other ideas than doing what pg_dump does? I'm afraid not. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: