Re: Bad link for win32/latest
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad link for win32/latest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10809240033o7c1723d6m1e4beb423399e2ac@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bad link for win32/latest (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad link for win32/latest
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Robert Treat wrote: >> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to >>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3. >>> >> >> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't listing 8.3.4 >> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/ > > I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push out > soon :-) > > I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did we > say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some removing > to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and > 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we > have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have > source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not > very consistent :-( > > If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments out :-) Marc was managing that (and the symlinks) iirc. I'm not sure what rules he was working to. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: