Re: Bad link for win32/latest
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad link for win32/latest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48DCC9EC.4030502@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bad link for win32/latest ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Re: Bad link for win32/latest |
Список | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> Robert Treat wrote: >>> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to >>>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3. >>>> >>> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't listing 8.3.4 >>> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/ >> I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push out >> soon :-) >> >> I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did we >> say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some removing >> to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and >> 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we >> have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have >> source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not >> very consistent :-( >> >> If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments out :-) > > Marc was managing that (and the symlinks) iirc. I'm not sure what > rules he was working to. > Marc? What's the usual deal? //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: