Re: SAN performance mystery
От | Jeff Trout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SAN performance mystery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 922914D7-46ED-4623-905A-C56058551905@torgo.978.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SAN performance mystery (Tim Allen <tim@proximity.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: SAN performance mystery
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Jun 16, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Tim Allen wrote: > > One curious thing is that some postgres backends seem to spend an > inordinate amount of time in uninterruptible iowait state. I found > a posting to this list from December 2004 from someone who reported > that very same thing. For example, bringing down postgres on the > customer box requires kill -9, because there are invariably one or > two processes so deeply uninterruptible as to not respond to a > politer signal. That indicates something not quite right, doesn't it? > Sounds like there could be a driver/array/kernel bug there that is kicking the performance down the tube. If it was PG's fault it wouldn't be stuck uninterruptable. -- Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com> http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: